We Interrupt Lent to Bring You … Canada Reads!

The frabjous day (calloo! callay!!!) is finally here.  Canada Reads begins tomorrow.

For those of you not in the know, Canada Reads is a nationally-broadcast radio competition where five people each defend a book that they have chosen to be the book all Canada should read.  And lots of us Canadian bibliophiles listen and cheer for our favourite books and whine when they are voted off.  Last book standing is the winner. And the debates begin, on CBC radio and online, tomorrow, March 8!!

Since I am once again giving up fiction for Lent (and am running through the reviews of my nonfiction LentBooks as I complete them) I made sure to get all the Canada Reads books out of the library as soon as they were announced months ago and zip through them.  I excluded Ann Marie Macdonald’s Fall on Your Knees on the grounds that I had read it years ago and had no desire to re-read it. Mini-review: beautifully written; way too depressing. So obviously my vote doesn’t go to that book. 

The first new read I plunged into was Marina Endicott’s Good to a Fault.  It was a slow start and took a few chapters before I really got into it, but I ended up loving it.  I then proceeded on through Wayson Choy’s The Jade Peony and Nicholas Dickner’s Nikolski.  Both, also beautifully written, but there wasn’t quite enough story there to content me.  The Jade Peony was really three lovely linked novellas, but I wanted more from each story.  The inter-relations between the three characters in Nikolski were fascinating, but the fact that they never came together felt like a clever literary device that didn’t satisfy.  In a way, it was another three separate novellas problem; though the chapters were interspersed, the storylines weren’t.

Then I met my Waterloo in the form of Douglas Coupland’s Generation X.  Sometimes the problem with a book is just that it’s been way too overhyped before you ever pick it up.  Other times, the problem is that I don’t like the characters. I read about five chapters of Generation X and found myself wishing all three characters would die in a tragic fire so I wouldn’t have to read about them anymore.  To my shame, I returned Generation X to the library when someone put in a request for it (I guess that worked out well for them) and never tried it again. So you could say I failed at my attempt to read my way through Canada Reads.

But it’s OK. I’m at peace, because I found one book I truly loved.  Good to a Fault is, in its simplest form, about a middle aged woman I can easily relate to, whose midlife crisis takes the form of responding to what she thinks might be the prompting of the Holy Spirit to do something risky — like let a homeless family move into her house. What follows is honest, funny, tragic, and (one of my favourite things in a book) a realistic exploration of how faith, hope and love can touch and transform ordinary lives.  It’s so good I will mention it in the same breath as Marilynne Robinson’s Gilead and Home, which from me is high praise indeed.

So, I’ll be listening avidly to see how Canada Reads goes and how my favourite book fares.  I may also be doing some updates here before I get back to reviewing my Lenten reading list, so keep watching!



Filed under Canada Reads

3 responses to “We Interrupt Lent to Bring You … Canada Reads!

  1. I’m also cheering for Good to a Fault! It wasn’t my absolute favourite of the books — that would have to go to Fall on Your Knees (very surprisingly) — but I think it is one that Canada should read. I liked the message of the book and appreciated the way that it was told.

    It’s a book that I think the more you think about the more your unravel. I often find myself thinking: am I being good or am I being selfish? Where do the lines blur?

    Listening to Day 1 though, I have no idea how things are going to go.

  2. I think it’s because I already think about that a lot — how much do motives matter as opposed to my actual actions? — that the book touched such a chord with me. Plus, I could really identify with Clary.

    The most amazing thing for me on Day One was the panelist (can’t remember which, but one of the men — Rollie perhaps?) who said the grammar was bad in Good to a Fault … using phrases like “could of” and “should of” in narration as well as in dialogue. I was amazed he couldn’t see where those were being used and that even though it wasn’t dialogue, it was an attempt to get into the head of the character (usually Dolly, I think) whose point of view was being used in a particular chapter. She didn’t use things like “could of” in Clary’s chapters, or Paul’s.

    • Yeah, I was rather surprised when Rollie said that too. I thought it was a low blow.

      We’ll see how things go today. On Twitter, Rollie said he thinks he is a marked man.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s